4 in Roman Numerals
but VI is OK
Strange
I think its probably because its short for Ive?
May I suggest using 4 instead.
Apologies for any inconvenience fella.
Good thinking Jermal, I see you are the brains of this operation.:lol:
Course.
May I suggest using 4 instead. Or 00110100.
I wouldn't be so sure. That isn't 4 in binary.
It's 52.
You shouldn't have second guessed yourself, as your first thought was correct.
It would seem that to keep on top of all forms of possible text speak some instances will prove to be mildly anal, but that's a worthy sacrifice in order to hold yourself above the rest haha
I would suggest that filtering text speak is all well and good but it becomes a bit OTT when it causes acceptable wording/numbering to also be censored. Just seems ever so slightly anal.
It would seem that to keep on top of all forms of possible text speak some instances will prove to be mildly anal, but that's a worthy sacrifice in order to hold yourself above the rest haha
Nothing wrong with having a filter, just don't get carried away. Just a few of the more well known text speak terms should be filtered imo. And not just filtered to **, as the user won't know why it's been changed. perhaps filtered to a NO TEXT SPEAK in bold would help people more.