Fine, carry on.
What the bollox is that all about??quote]
It was a proven technique by academics. They tested it against someone driving in what was most widely considered as the most economic driving technique, i.e. slowly etc, and this "new" technique returned quite a bit more than that.
IIRC its based on the theory that if you partially open the throttle it is very inefficient, whereas it is much more efficient to keep the throttle wide open and closed when not needed. The 2000rpm thing was the point at which friction or something becomes too much for fuel economy. Shame I don't have the article anymore, but if anyone else reads AE, I'm sure they'd come across it.
Don't knock it until you've tried it mate.
What the bollox is that all about??quote]
It was a proven technique by academics. They tested it against someone driving in what was most widely considered as the most economic driving technique, i.e. slowly etc, and this "new" technique returned quite a bit more than that.
IIRC its based on the theory that if you partially open the throttle it is very inefficient, whereas it is much more efficient to keep the throttle wide open and closed when not needed. The 2000rpm thing was the point at which friction or something becomes too much for fuel economy. Shame I don't have the article anymore, but if anyone else reads AE, I'm sure they'd come across it.
Don't knock it until you've tried it mate.
That technique would need to be adapted to each engine. With a good map a k20 can be quite economical. It all depends what you're after.
it would actually be interesting if you could find the article back.
i find that my ep3 drinks alot more fuel than average. i tend to keep getting 220miles out of a full tank with no vtec-ing, hard driving. just normal shifting at 3 - 3.5k rpm. driving in peak traffic a bit but not very heavy.driving 40 mins to work and back. many others seem to get a lot more under my driving conditions.any thoughts on this ? appreciate any input on this.