Ok so I know this isn't highly scientific, but hey, compared to most things that get posted on forums it's about as accurate as we'll get.
Car: 2002 RSX Type S
Stock WBHP: 171.9wbhp@7800rpm 122lbft@6500rpm
+ Injen CAI, Toda Manifold, Mugen Catback & N2 Cams: 229.4 @ 8200rpm 158.8lbft @ 5800rpm
GAIN: 57.5whp 36.8ft/lbs
Vs
Car: 2002 RSX Type-S
Stock WBHP: 171.2wbhp @7500rpm 131.0lbft@6100rpm
+ Injen CAI, Toda Manifold, Toda Catback & N2 Cams: 231.1@8100rpm 165.1@6100rpm
GAIN: 59.9whp 34.0ft/lbs
Each car is different as we know, and this seems to highlight that pretty well. The Toda catback makes larger BHP gains, whereas the Mugen gives more torque, that is of course on the basis that each car is the same.
Still fairly interesting reading though.
I wait with baited breath to see what my CTR can do once N2's go in comparison to the above!
Car: 2002 RSX Type S
Stock WBHP: 171.9wbhp@7800rpm 122lbft@6500rpm
+ Injen CAI, Toda Manifold, Mugen Catback & N2 Cams: 229.4 @ 8200rpm 158.8lbft @ 5800rpm
GAIN: 57.5whp 36.8ft/lbs
Vs
Car: 2002 RSX Type-S
Stock WBHP: 171.2wbhp @7500rpm 131.0lbft@6100rpm
+ Injen CAI, Toda Manifold, Toda Catback & N2 Cams: 231.1@8100rpm 165.1@6100rpm
GAIN: 59.9whp 34.0ft/lbs
Each car is different as we know, and this seems to highlight that pretty well. The Toda catback makes larger BHP gains, whereas the Mugen gives more torque, that is of course on the basis that each car is the same.
Still fairly interesting reading though.
I wait with baited breath to see what my CTR can do once N2's go in comparison to the above!