And Spoon, let us not forget all the old skool Honda fanboys slated the EP for not being a True Type R, due to not having Recaros, LSD, and the front windshield being to thick.
Its a very good point you make, folks did. To be honest the EP3 was my first drive of a Type R (Although Ive since driven the lot barring the NSX and FD2) so I was new to the breed and therefore approached the EP3 objectively, even though I will admit I wasnt initially impressed with the first press releases I saw. It took a test drive for me to warm to the car. Later drives in the DC2, DC5, EK9 and ATR have shown the EP3 is far from the definitive Type R (In the absence of driving the FD2 and NSX that award sits with the DC2 imo), but I feel the EP3 is at least is worthy of its Type R moniker. Yeah ok in UK trim it lacked the LSD, Recaro's and thinner glass of the purer NSX, DC2 and EK9 that had gone before it, but considering the DC2 and ATR, the only previous Type R's offered to the UK, hadnt exacly been a runaway success in terms of sales, it was bold of Honda to offer a car far more uncompromising than the ATR it replaced in the first place. The Recaro's and LSD etc were ditched from the UK car in a bid to pitch it at a knock down price to get folks interested. And it was a sales success as a result. The thing with the FN2 is that Honda seem to have warmed the UK to the Type R, and then drastically changed what the Type R is all about, at least here in the UK anyway. And for that reason I cant help but think they've messed up a bit.
You and I have talked before about this, and you know I think Honda should have made more of the Type S badge. Take the current FN2 CTR and put a Type S badge on the boot and every motoring magazine, Top Gear included, would be nodding in admiration at what is a likeable warm hatch, much as they did with the Ford Focus ST170. But then give us a harder, meaner less cosseting more focused model that appeals to drivers like me and the countless other enthusiasts who want their hot model to be just that, hot. Ford have proven it can be done with the ST and RS badges, so have Renault with the Sport and Cup/Trophy versions of its go-faster models. There is room in every showroom for a fast model with the luxury spec and a stripped out pared back animal. Honda seem to have missed this point completely, and as a result the new CTR is not the step on many of us hoped it would have, no should have been.
Dont think Im a hater. Ive driven the FN2, and I like it, its a very good car. But its not the EP3 replacement I hoped for. For that I suspect I will have to wait until I get a go in the FD2.